Since this article has been cooling down, I think now I can contribute a few points of my very personal view with specific facts to your little off-topic political agenda discussion, to avoid pissing off some sensitive ones who could be unable to accept such facts again finally. Happy New Year to all :=) Peace ‘n’ Love in a Zen attitude, Commenter Whatever, let’s take the time to read and listen comfortably, open-minded! That’s when I feel like taking a seat, inviting others to do as well, and to choose between “Peace (& love) bro” or a more academic wording such as “Zen, my friends”. We are, i’m afraid, confronted to an increasing lack of fine-tuned ideas and their understanding. That’s all what I meant to say : interpreting one’s words is a trending behavior, maybe because of modern life’s speed leading to speedy understanding in a speedy world. Lastly, Big Ears are very much the fact of the Western world and are not really what you could call deployed by private companies… The worst in this opposition is to consider that trusting a country which logs users’ data is not compatible with trust, but I perceive no legitimate digression leading to communism and democracy : after all data logging is not specific to Russia and the only difference would be that spying on users in the Western world is led by private companies when it is or may be led by governments elsewhere. We may very well as trust “Russia and China” and nevertheless agree with Commenter’s statement that “Russian operators and websites are required to keep your data, check out the Yarovaya law.” : one one hand a sentiment (trust) and on the other a fact (data logging). What I meant when answering on his/her answer on Commenter’s comment was that, IMO, there was nothing which explicitly nor even implicitly raised a political argument. Interpreting a comment is the source of many clashes, misunderstanding or deducting what is not explicit. Obvious, right?! Well, you’ll always have minds to believe that what seems obvious must hide a ruse =) To make it slightly confusing we can spice it with “Poetry and astronomical digressions apart, what’s the only day where we can say that yesterday was last year”. Most of all, it doesn’t collect or share user data, so they can be assured their data is safe.Vaak, what’s the only day where we can say that yesterday was last year? Ask it to an audience and see who answers first. By creating its own powerful proprietary stealth protocol and supporting it with a set of useful features, this VPN has an edge over its peers. With the VPN market so saturated, it’s hard to distinguish oneself from the competition, but AdGuard VPN does exactly just that. Some can also notice the absence of a live chat feature and an option to pay with crypto. Unfortunately, the developers aren’t offering a free trial for all of these features. More importantly, it follows a no-logging policy. Users will rarely experience speed dips, and even if they do, it won’t be significant. This VPN’s protocol allows it to be reliable while still keeping network speeds close to the original. It’s easy to use while still offering advanced features. Its robust feature set and specifications allows this VPN to cater to both power users and beginners. It has servers in over 52 locations around the globe. Moreover, it allows torrenting and works with the largest streaming service, Netflix. It offers an automatic kill switch that can come in handy in various situations. This protocol, coupled with AES-256 encryption and HTTPS/2 protocol makes it a powerful VPN. Their proprietary protocol, the AdGuard VPN protocol, allows the app to work with other VPN apps and disguises users’ VPN traffic as regular traffic without causing a significant hit on speeds. The AdGuard team decided to create their own VPN protocol to solve two problems: app incompatibility and speed drops resulting from obfuscation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |